Resources/Glossary/
Standard Work Combination Table
Process Improvement Tools

Standard Work Combination Table

Manual, walk, and machine time across one cycle.

Updated
·
5
min read
Definition

What is Standard Work Combination Table?

A standard work combination table is a one-page chart that sequences manual time, walk time, and machine time for a single operator across one cycle at takt. It is the detailed instrument that backs up standardized work, showing how each element fits into the cycle and where any overlap or wait exists. Without it, standardized work is documentation without sequencing.

A standard work combination table is the most detailed instrument inside the standardized work toolkit. Where the standardized work chart shows the layout and sequence at a glance and the analysis sheet does the math, the combination table puts the operator's cycle on a stopwatch grid and shows exactly how manual time, walk time, and machine time fit together within takt. The diagnostic value is in the overlap. Manual work that has to happen while a machine is idle is wasted overlap, and the table makes it visible by drawing the three categories on the same chart so the team can see the dead air.

"The cycle is not three separate stopwatches. It is one chart with the three colors interleaved. The interleaving is where the throughput lives."

How a standard work combination table works

A combination table is a grid with time on the X axis (usually in seconds) and work elements as rows. Three visual conventions distinguish the categories of time:

  • Manual time (often a solid bar) is when the operator is working hands-on at an element.
  • Walk time (often a dotted or wavy line) is when the operator is moving between locations.
  • Machine time (often a hollow or striped bar) is when the machine is running and the operator could be doing something else.

Takt time is drawn as a vertical line on the chart. The operator's loaded time has to fit within takt, with a small safety margin. The chart is built element by element, with each row showing one work element across its duration in the appropriate color. The team can read down the chart and see exactly what is happening at every second of the cycle.

The diagnostic value lies in the overlap between manual and machine time. If the machine runs for 60 seconds and the operator stands waiting during that window, the chart shows it as dead air. The improvement opportunity is to load manual work into that machine-running window, whether by adding an inspection step, an in-cycle deburr, a pre-stage of the next part, or a walk to a complementary station.

The combination table is built with the operator who runs the cycle. The data comes from a real time study. Built without the operator or from estimates, the chart looks authoritative and quietly inaccurate.

Where a standard work combination table fits on the shop floor of a small manufacturer

Imagine a 22-person precision CNC shop running a high-volume part with an 85-second takt. The operator currently loads the machine, watches the 50-second machine cycle, unloads, walks to inspection, returns, and reloads. Total loaded time is about 28 seconds. The remaining time, especially the 50 seconds of machine cycle, is spent watching.

The shift lead and the operator build a combination table together. They use time-study data to mark manual load at 11 seconds, machine cycle at 50 seconds, manual unload at 9 seconds, walk to inspection at 4 seconds, inspection at 6 seconds, walk back at 4 seconds. The chart shows 30 seconds of overlap available during machine cycle.

The team uses the overlap to move two activities into the cycle. The operator now starts inspection of the previous part during the machine cycle of the next, and pre-stages the next blank during the same window. Loaded time rises from 28 to about 60 seconds, all within the 85-second takt. The shop adds a small fixture for the inspection step at the machine so the operator does not have to walk. Throughput on the part rises 18 percent without a second operator or a second machine.

That is a combination table at small scale. A piece of grid paper, real time-study data, and an overlap that was invisible until the chart drew it.

Common mistakes with standard work combination tables

  • Built from estimates. The chart looks right and is wrong. Use a real time study.
  • Machine time omitted. Without the third category, the overlap opportunity is invisible. Always include machine time even if it is long.
  • Static document. Combination tables shift as elements change, takt moves, and operators find better sequencing. Update them with the standardized work.
  • No operator involvement. The combination table without the operator who runs the cycle is fiction. They have to be in the room.
  • Treating it in isolation. The combination table is part of standardized work, not a freestanding document. It supports the other artifacts and is updated together with them.

Standard work combination table and related Lean tools

A standard work combination table is one of the three documents that make up standardized work, alongside the standardized work chart and the analysis sheet. It is closely related to standard work more broadly. The time data that populates the chart comes from a time study. When comparing total work across multiple operators against takt, the same time data is plotted as a yamazumi chart.

Common questions

The questions we hear most about this term.

How does a standard work combination table work?
A combination table is a grid. Time runs along the top in seconds. Each row is one work element. Three colors or line styles distinguish manual time (operator working hands-on), walk time (operator moving between locations), and machine time (machine running while operator can do other work). The takt time is drawn as a vertical line. The operator's cycle is plotted element by element, with each element shown as a bar in the appropriate color across its duration. The chart reveals whether the operator's loaded time fits within takt and where overlaps between manual and machine time create dead air.
How is a standard work combination table different from standardized work?
Standardized work is the overall practice and includes three documents: the standardized work chart (layout and sequence), the standardized work combination table (manual, walk, and machine time sequencing), and the standardized work analysis sheet (the calculation). The combination table is one of the three. Doing standardized work without a combination table is possible for very simple work, but cycle-time-sensitive operations need the table to see how manual and machine time fit together. The table is the instrument; standardized work is the practice the instrument supports.
Is a standard work combination table the same as a yamazumi chart?
No, though they share the same underlying time data. A combination table sequences manual, walk, and machine time for one operator across one cycle, the detail view. A yamazumi chart compares total work across multiple operators against takt, the cross-operator view. The combination table answers "how is one operator's cycle sequenced?" The yamazumi answers "is the line balanced across operators?" Most lean implementations build both. They are complementary, not interchangeable.
What are common mistakes with standard work combination tables?
The biggest is building the table from estimates instead of a real time study. Manual and walk times that are guessed look fine on paper and produce a sequence that does not work on the floor. The second is leaving machine time off the chart, which hides the overlap opportunity where the operator could be doing manual work elsewhere while the machine runs. The third is treating the table as a static document, real shops revise it as elements shift, takt changes, and operators find better sequencing. The fourth is creating one without the operator who runs the cycle.
What does a standard work combination table look like on the shop floor of a small manufacturer?
Imagine a 25-person CNC shop running a part with a 90-second takt. The operator loads the machine, the cycle runs for 55 seconds, then the operator unloads and inspects. The shift lead and the operator build a combination table that shows 12 seconds of manual load, 55 seconds of machine cycle, 8 seconds of manual unload, and 6 seconds of walk to the inspection bench. The chart shows 14 seconds of dead air during the machine cycle. The team uses that overlap to move a deburr step into the cycle, lifting throughput and bringing the operator's loaded time to 35 seconds within the 90-second window.

Ditch the whiteboards and spreadsheets.

Same-day setup. No distributor lock-in. Zero stockouts. Top teams double revenue in 9 months.